Bush said that he is willing to take suggestions on changing the "No Child Left Behind" Act as long as the standards are not lowered. He insisted that there would be absolutely "
no compromise on the basic principle: Every child must learn to read and do math at, or above, grade level". He and educators of students agreed that schools should map out the individual progress of each student and that schools who miss progress goals by a little should not face the same consequences as those who miss them by a lot. However, to enact these new changes, new funds would be needed, and seeing how the original legislation did not get the funding that was voted on draws fierce opposition from the conservative and liberal wings of Congress. There was a lack of collective funding for the original legislation that made it hard to enforce.
Changes that Bush have listed include :
—Give local leaders more flexibility and resources.
—Offer other educational options to families of children stuck in low-performing schools.
—Increase access to tutoring programs.
—Reward good teachers who improve student achievement in low-income schools.
—Expand access to advanced placement courses.
—Improve math and science instruction.
Shouldn't the government help fund for this program? It makes all these changes that would require even more funding than the original legislation and yet does not have a provision for helping the states with money? All these changes look great on paper, but without proper funding, they are useless and putting the pressure on the states to raise the funds is not a great idea.
1 comment:
I think that making changes to the "No Child Left Behind" Act, will not be beneficial to America. It already has too many problems such as difficulties with standardized testing, and a narrow curriculum. I believe a teacher's primary concern in their job should be making sure their students understand the material they teach. The extra pressure of meeting the federal standards of education is an extra burden. Also, as Will mention, raising the funds needed to impose any new changes will only add pressure to states. We need to find the money to support this act before we make any new changes。
Post a Comment