Poor Poor Kids

Hey, I nearly forgot to post tonight with all of this turkey excitement. Good thing I didn't, because I've got a weird one for you guys tonight.

We've all heard about the mass toy recall over the last few months. Most of these recalls are due to the plastic that the toys are made out of being laced with lead (If you haven't heard of this, you can check out a list of some of the toys that were recalled here). This massive toy recall has been a huge inconvenience to many consumers of Mattel products and other companies of similar nature. Further than that, one demographic is finding this more devastating than the parents who have to return little Billy's Batman figurine, and that's charity groups.

Charity groups like the Salvation Army take in box loads of donations daily. At the end of the donation time, staff members sort through clothes, dishes, appliances and crates upon crates of toys. Around Christmas time, this is usually a nice little trend for the groups but now with so many toys being recalled, sorting has become exponentially more tedious.

Because most of the donations given to the Salvation Army are second hand products, most do not come in their original packaging. For that reason, staff members can't just simply see the name of the model and check recall lists, they have to find serial numbers and other forms of i.d's on each toy and call the manufacturer to check. This has become quite the hassle to many of the charities and in response, some have chosen to not accept toy donations anymore.

The reason I felt that this semi-trivial story was worthy of telling you guys is this. These charities are some of the only ways some less fortunate children can get Christmas gifts this year. Many of these stores take toys off of their stock shelves and give them out for free to struggling tots during the holidays. Now that Goodwills and Salvation Armies aren't allowing toys in their stores, there are going to be a lot of disappointed little guys this holiday season.

Entertainment Before Sympathy

From 1936 to 1939, a deadly war feuded in Spain between fascist dictator Francisco Franco and a group of rebel guerrilla republicans. This, the Spanish Civil war, is still a tragedy that the Spanish people struggle with. Being that the war ended only 68 years ago, most of the children of war victims are still alive. Only recently have actions been made to sympathize with those families. For example, a Historical Memory Law has just been passed this month to recognize the disputed deaths of Franco's opposition. Franco still has surviving followers who hail him on the day of his death yearly and rejoice in his victory of the war. As you can see, this, as I said, is still very alive and has not been rendered to a mere memory yet.

Despite the controversy and pain surrounding this historical event, a new video game depicting this time period is being released. Shadows of War: the Spanish Civil War is being released on the thirty-second year anniversary of Francisco Franco's death. It is a game where players can choose to either play on the Spanish Military's or the Rebel's side. Game play includes covert missions, airborne attacks, hand to hand combat and all that comes with a revolution.

Families of war victims and many other people are highly offended by the release of this game. The people feel (based on the nature of other video games) that killing characters will be a routine part of game play and thus will become trivial and meaningless. The game is fairly historically accurate (besides options changed for more challenging play), so it mentions real names of people who were involved and depicts some of them in animated form. Seeing how the war is only just recently being worked through, it is easy to see the lack of appropriateness in the release of this game.

I think that the game should not be released. It is sacrificing the sensitivity of families who lost loved ones for the sake of entertainment. Al though creators of the game claim that it teaches people about the event, really its all for fun. The game will have players enjoying shooting people and dropping bombs from an airplane on people who's kids are still in mourning. How would we feel if a video game came out about recent terrorist attacks or of this war came out? Would the fact that it came out in 2069 (68 years later) change the fact that players could either chose to be the side that blows up houses in Iraq, or the side that crashed airplanes into the World Trade Center based on play preferance? What has pop culture come to these days where people can be so insensitive to each other just to please ourselves?

life in the death penalty?

According to about a dozen recent studies, executions save lives. For every inmate put to death, about 3 to 18 murders are prevented. According to some of these studies, this effect can be most seen in Texas and other states where inmates are executed more frequently than in other states. These studies were performed by economists in the last decade and reveal that murder rates decrease as the number of executions increase.

While I am not completely surprised by what is found in the studies, I feel that this definitely complicates the ethical debate surrounding the death penalty. I have always opposed the death penalty, yet with more money going to overcrowded prisons than to schools and with this new statistic, I find that I might be quite confused about the stance I should take regarding this issue. Is it truly worth it to spare one life at the risk of 3 to 18 others?

When is it going to end?

Earlier today, the FBI released a report that revealed an eight percent increase in hate crimes as a result of prejudice against race, religion, ethnicity or physical or mental disability as of 2006. In 2005, there were 7,163 reported criminal incidents and that increased to 7,722 last year. Only 12,600 of the 17,000 local, county, state and federal police agencies participated in this report and more than half of the incidents that occurred in Jena, Louisiana in late 2006 were not included.

However, this incomplete report did not stop civil rights protestors from demonstrating at the Justice Department in Washington. Also, in September, about 20,000 protesters marched through Jena and just on November 3^rd, hundreds of protesters marched through downtown Charleston,WV to urge others to add to hate crime charges against six white people who beated, tortured and sexually assaulted a 20 year old black woman.

Although the number of hate crimes has increased, the percentage of those caused by racial prejudice has decreased to 51.8 percent in 2006 from 54.7 percent in 2005. In the 2006 report,18.9 percent of hate crimes is blamed on religious bias, 15.5 percent on sexual orientation, and 12.7 percent on ethnic or national origin.

While I feel that we are all lucky to be living in a time and place where there is so much tolerance, this also makes me realize that not everyone across the country is as fortunate as we are. When are people ever going to stop? And why is it so difficult for them to accept people whom they feel are different from them?

They Just Keep Quitting

In the last year alone, many advisers have resigned from the Bush administration. We saw Rumsfeld call the quits last year and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales bid farewell just two months ago and the list goes on. Well, now our boy Dubya has another friend to miss as Fran Townsend (one of Bush's leading terrorist action advisers) packs her bags.

Fran Townsend had served Bush since early 2003. She played a huge role in the decision making of the Homeland Security Council and all in all was a key figure in our nation's considered caution toward terrorism. The president announced her resignation earlier this morning, but as it stands now, no one seems to know why she quit.

Because of her position, she spent most of her time defending Bush's decisions and helping to clarify his words to make him look better in the public eye. Taking this under consideration, we wonder why did she quit? Perhaps she was just doing her job and didn't really support Bush's reactions to acts of terrorism. Maybe she just got tired of being on the losing side. One can easily say that Bush has lost a significant amount of support lately. This decrease in popularity could have got to her head.

I know that asking this question is going to set this blog on fire with tons of answers, but I will ask it anyway for the sake of hearing you readers' likely enraged views.

WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP RESIGNING FROM THE BUSH WHITE HOUSE?!

Don't be a Victim of Cyberbullies!

Hey guys and gals. I'm sure many of you have myspace, facebook, or any other social network accounts. I'm sure you guys are mature enough to know who to talk to on these social networks. But if you don't.. maybe you should take a peek at this video: LINK. This video is about a girl who committed suicide last year because she was deeply into myspace and talking to a stranger who played with her heart. It is truly a tragic event and will hopefully teach other members a lesson.

Clinton Stands the Heat

Yesterday, November 15, was the Democratic debate in Nevada. Although there were seven Democratic presidential candidates participating in this debate, it seemed like it was everyone against Clinton. A majority of these attacks turned up the heat during the debate. Senator Barack Obama clearly states that Clinton isn't delivering the simple answers to the complicated questions that Americans are seeking. Giving another point, Senator John Edwards critisized Clinton for contradicting herself on her Iraq policy, saying that she thinks we need to end the war in Iraq while also wanting to keep combat troops in Iraq. Edwards also states that she talks about making it a challenge for Bush and other Republicans, and then voting with him. Offended by Edwards' personal attack, Clinton responds, "I don't mind taking hits on my record on issues, but when somebody starts throwing mud, at least we can hope that it's both accurate and not right out of the Republican playbook." She goes on to explain why the other candidates are targeting her. She is ahead, and both her and the other candidates know it. Clinton takes a stand and defends herself by making it known that she will not allow herself to be belittled. Clinton was leading by a good 20 points before the Nevada debate. Will this debate increase her popularity? Do you think she will make it to primaries?